Review



recombinant human her2 erbb2  (Sino Biological)


Bioz Verified Symbol Sino Biological is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Sino Biological manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Sino Biological recombinant human her2 erbb2
    Recombinant Human Her2 Erbb2, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 84 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human her2 erbb2/product/Sino Biological
    Average 95 stars, based on 84 article reviews
    recombinant human her2 erbb2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    Sino Biological recombinant human her2 erbb2
    Recombinant Human Her2 Erbb2, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human her2 erbb2/product/Sino Biological
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human her2 erbb2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Sino Biological recombinant human her
    Recombinant Human Her, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human her/product/Sino Biological
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human her - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Sino Biological recombinant human erbb2
    Recombinant Human Erbb2, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human erbb2/product/Sino Biological
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human erbb2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Sino Biological recombinant human her2
    Recombinant Human Her2, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human her2/product/Sino Biological
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human her2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Sino Biological recombinant human her2 protein
    Transcriptomic analysis of FcγR and immune cell expression. A and B, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) visualization of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from pretreatment samples, <t>HER2+</t> ( A ) and TNBC ( GSE176078 ; B ). C and D, FCGR genes were plotted for each immune cell subtype for HER2+ ( C ) and TNBC ( D ). E, Comparison of normalized log 2 FCGR expression from bulk mRNA data from HER2+ patients before trastuzumab treatment ( GSE76360 ). Patients were classified into pCR or no pCR. Statistical significance was calculated using the Wilcoxon test. F, FCGR3A expression and immune cell subtypes estimated using ConsensusTME from bulk mRNA data from HER2+ patients before trastuzumab treatment ( GSE109710 ). G, Representative images of pretreatment TNBC, evaluated by spatial transcriptomic analysis of the publicly available dataset GSE210616 (24 tumor sections from 12 patients). H, Venn diagrams of coexpression of FOLR1 and FCGR from spatial transcriptomic analysis. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ns, not significant.
    Recombinant Human Her2 Protein, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human her2 protein/product/Sino Biological
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human her2 protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Sino Biological recombinant human her2 ecd
    Illustration of in silico design and experimental validation of <t>HER2-binding</t> proteins. (A) Structure of ZHER2:342 (green cartoon) in complex with HER2 (gray surface), utilized as a probe for structural profile detection. EvoDesign REMC simulations are performed to create sequence decoys as guided by the structural profile and physical force fields. (B) Left: histogram displaying EvoDesign sequence decoys ranked by EvoEF2 binding energy, folding integrity of I-TASSER model to the probe, and spacial aggregation property, respectively. Eleven top-ranking designs are highlighted in purple. Right: eleven designs are selected based on consensus scoring, with colors in the Venn diagram corresponding to those in left. (C) Left: The pCTCON plasmid vector is engineered to express the designed sequences (BindHer) with N-terminal HA and C-terminal cMyc epitope tags, fused to the yeast mating protein Aga2p on the yeast surface. Right: density plots of protein expression ( y -axis, Alexa Fluor 647 detected via anti-cMyc antibody) versus HER2 binding ( x -axis, Alexa Fluor 488 via Streptavidin–Alexa assay). Design-A: high HER2 affinity; Design-NA: low HER2 affinity.
    Recombinant Human Her2 Ecd, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human her2 ecd/product/Sino Biological
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human her2 ecd - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Sino Biological recombinant human her2 erbb2 protein
    Illustration of in silico design and experimental validation of <t>HER2-binding</t> proteins. (A) Structure of ZHER2:342 (green cartoon) in complex with HER2 (gray surface), utilized as a probe for structural profile detection. EvoDesign REMC simulations are performed to create sequence decoys as guided by the structural profile and physical force fields. (B) Left: histogram displaying EvoDesign sequence decoys ranked by EvoEF2 binding energy, folding integrity of I-TASSER model to the probe, and spacial aggregation property, respectively. Eleven top-ranking designs are highlighted in purple. Right: eleven designs are selected based on consensus scoring, with colors in the Venn diagram corresponding to those in left. (C) Left: The pCTCON plasmid vector is engineered to express the designed sequences (BindHer) with N-terminal HA and C-terminal cMyc epitope tags, fused to the yeast mating protein Aga2p on the yeast surface. Right: density plots of protein expression ( y -axis, Alexa Fluor 647 detected via anti-cMyc antibody) versus HER2 binding ( x -axis, Alexa Fluor 488 via Streptavidin–Alexa assay). Design-A: high HER2 affinity; Design-NA: low HER2 affinity.
    Recombinant Human Her2 Erbb2 Protein, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human her2 erbb2 protein/product/Sino Biological
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human her2 erbb2 protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Transcriptomic analysis of FcγR and immune cell expression. A and B, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) visualization of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from pretreatment samples, HER2+ ( A ) and TNBC ( GSE176078 ; B ). C and D, FCGR genes were plotted for each immune cell subtype for HER2+ ( C ) and TNBC ( D ). E, Comparison of normalized log 2 FCGR expression from bulk mRNA data from HER2+ patients before trastuzumab treatment ( GSE76360 ). Patients were classified into pCR or no pCR. Statistical significance was calculated using the Wilcoxon test. F, FCGR3A expression and immune cell subtypes estimated using ConsensusTME from bulk mRNA data from HER2+ patients before trastuzumab treatment ( GSE109710 ). G, Representative images of pretreatment TNBC, evaluated by spatial transcriptomic analysis of the publicly available dataset GSE210616 (24 tumor sections from 12 patients). H, Venn diagrams of coexpression of FOLR1 and FCGR from spatial transcriptomic analysis. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ns, not significant.

    Journal: Cancer Research

    Article Title: An Fc-Engineered Glycomodified Antibody Supports Proinflammatory Activation of Immune Effector Cells and Restricts Progression of Breast Cancer

    doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-24-3174

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Transcriptomic analysis of FcγR and immune cell expression. A and B, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) visualization of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from pretreatment samples, HER2+ ( A ) and TNBC ( GSE176078 ; B ). C and D, FCGR genes were plotted for each immune cell subtype for HER2+ ( C ) and TNBC ( D ). E, Comparison of normalized log 2 FCGR expression from bulk mRNA data from HER2+ patients before trastuzumab treatment ( GSE76360 ). Patients were classified into pCR or no pCR. Statistical significance was calculated using the Wilcoxon test. F, FCGR3A expression and immune cell subtypes estimated using ConsensusTME from bulk mRNA data from HER2+ patients before trastuzumab treatment ( GSE109710 ). G, Representative images of pretreatment TNBC, evaluated by spatial transcriptomic analysis of the publicly available dataset GSE210616 (24 tumor sections from 12 patients). H, Venn diagrams of coexpression of FOLR1 and FCGR from spatial transcriptomic analysis. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ns, not significant.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant human HER2 protein (Sino Biological, cat. #10004-H08H) or recombinant human FOLR1a (FRα) protein (Sino Biological, cat. #11241-H08H) was covalently coupled to Luminex MagPlex carboxylate-modified beads (Luminex/Diasorin S.p.A., cat. #MC10005-01, MC10027-01, MC10033-01, MC10045-01, MC10097-01) using the carbodiimide reagent EDC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. #35391) and amine-reactive Sulfo-NHS ester (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. # PIA39269 ).

    Techniques: Expressing, Comparison

    Cell binding and Fab-mediated functionality of FcγRIIIa-enhanced antibodies. A, Binding of anti-HER2 and anti-FRα IgG variants (0.03–10 µg/mL) to NK cells evaluated by flow cytometry ( n = 4). B and C, Binding of monomeric anti-HER2 IgG variants (0.0001–10 µg/mL) to HER2-expressing (SKBR3 and HCC1954) or nonexpressing (CAL51) cells ( n = 3–6; B ) or to FRα-expressing (CAL51 and T47D) or nonexpressing (SKBR3) cells ( n = 3–6; C ). D, Impact of antibodies on proliferation detected by live-cell imaging (Incucyte; n = 3). Representative images of cells treated with 10 μg/mL anti-HER2 antibody variants for 5 days. Scale bar, 100 μm. MFI, median fluorescence intensity.

    Journal: Cancer Research

    Article Title: An Fc-Engineered Glycomodified Antibody Supports Proinflammatory Activation of Immune Effector Cells and Restricts Progression of Breast Cancer

    doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-24-3174

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Cell binding and Fab-mediated functionality of FcγRIIIa-enhanced antibodies. A, Binding of anti-HER2 and anti-FRα IgG variants (0.03–10 µg/mL) to NK cells evaluated by flow cytometry ( n = 4). B and C, Binding of monomeric anti-HER2 IgG variants (0.0001–10 µg/mL) to HER2-expressing (SKBR3 and HCC1954) or nonexpressing (CAL51) cells ( n = 3–6; B ) or to FRα-expressing (CAL51 and T47D) or nonexpressing (SKBR3) cells ( n = 3–6; C ). D, Impact of antibodies on proliferation detected by live-cell imaging (Incucyte; n = 3). Representative images of cells treated with 10 μg/mL anti-HER2 antibody variants for 5 days. Scale bar, 100 μm. MFI, median fluorescence intensity.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant human HER2 protein (Sino Biological, cat. #10004-H08H) or recombinant human FOLR1a (FRα) protein (Sino Biological, cat. #11241-H08H) was covalently coupled to Luminex MagPlex carboxylate-modified beads (Luminex/Diasorin S.p.A., cat. #MC10005-01, MC10027-01, MC10033-01, MC10045-01, MC10097-01) using the carbodiimide reagent EDC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. #35391) and amine-reactive Sulfo-NHS ester (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. # PIA39269 ).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Live Cell Imaging, Fluorescence

    Illustration of in silico design and experimental validation of HER2-binding proteins. (A) Structure of ZHER2:342 (green cartoon) in complex with HER2 (gray surface), utilized as a probe for structural profile detection. EvoDesign REMC simulations are performed to create sequence decoys as guided by the structural profile and physical force fields. (B) Left: histogram displaying EvoDesign sequence decoys ranked by EvoEF2 binding energy, folding integrity of I-TASSER model to the probe, and spacial aggregation property, respectively. Eleven top-ranking designs are highlighted in purple. Right: eleven designs are selected based on consensus scoring, with colors in the Venn diagram corresponding to those in left. (C) Left: The pCTCON plasmid vector is engineered to express the designed sequences (BindHer) with N-terminal HA and C-terminal cMyc epitope tags, fused to the yeast mating protein Aga2p on the yeast surface. Right: density plots of protein expression ( y -axis, Alexa Fluor 647 detected via anti-cMyc antibody) versus HER2 binding ( x -axis, Alexa Fluor 488 via Streptavidin–Alexa assay). Design-A: high HER2 affinity; Design-NA: low HER2 affinity.

    Journal: Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B

    Article Title: Evolution-guided design of mini-protein for high-contrast in vivo imaging

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.07.015

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Illustration of in silico design and experimental validation of HER2-binding proteins. (A) Structure of ZHER2:342 (green cartoon) in complex with HER2 (gray surface), utilized as a probe for structural profile detection. EvoDesign REMC simulations are performed to create sequence decoys as guided by the structural profile and physical force fields. (B) Left: histogram displaying EvoDesign sequence decoys ranked by EvoEF2 binding energy, folding integrity of I-TASSER model to the probe, and spacial aggregation property, respectively. Eleven top-ranking designs are highlighted in purple. Right: eleven designs are selected based on consensus scoring, with colors in the Venn diagram corresponding to those in left. (C) Left: The pCTCON plasmid vector is engineered to express the designed sequences (BindHer) with N-terminal HA and C-terminal cMyc epitope tags, fused to the yeast mating protein Aga2p on the yeast surface. Right: density plots of protein expression ( y -axis, Alexa Fluor 647 detected via anti-cMyc antibody) versus HER2 binding ( x -axis, Alexa Fluor 488 via Streptavidin–Alexa assay). Design-A: high HER2 affinity; Design-NA: low HER2 affinity.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant Human HER2 ECD (1004-HCCH, Sino Biological) was immobilized (∼2000 resonance units) on a CM5 sensor chip (BR-1000-12, GE Life Sciences) and analyzed using a Biacore instrument (Biacore X100, GE Life Sciences).

    Techniques: In Silico, Biomarker Discovery, Binding Assay, Sequencing, Plasmid Preparation, Expressing

    Experimental characterization of designed HER2-binding (BindHer) proteins. (A) Real-time binding profile of computationally designed proteins with the HER2 ECD through surface plasmon resonance (SPR), where designed proteins were injected as analytes in a 2-fold dilution series ranging from 100 to 3.125 nmol/L. K D is the equilibrium dissociation constant. (B) Denaturation curves obtained using differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF), where designed proteins were subjected to thermal scans from 25 to 95 °C at a heating rate of 1 °C/min with signals recorded at wavelengths of 350/330 nm. Melting temperature ( T m ) is marked by vertical lines. (C) Circular dichroism (CD) spectra of designed proteins under controlled temperature and timing conditions. (D) Flow cytometry assessing HER2 binding to MDA-MB-231, BT-474, and SK-BR-3 cells using FITC-conjugated designed proteins. (E) Quantification of the signal transformation in terms of molar residue ellipticity (MRE) at a wavelength of 222 nm for the designed proteins in CD spectra. (F) Quantification of fluorescence intensity performed in D. (G) Evaluation of trypsin resistance, where designed proteins are incubated with trypsin concentrations in 0.01–10 μmol/L, followed by the analyses using SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis (top) and gray intensity analysis comparison (bottom). (H) In vivo living imaging from 1 to 8 h after FITC-labelled designed proteins administration via tail vein in HER2-overexpressing xenograft tumor-bearing mice; where other two designs (Design.01 and Design.03) which failed to target HER2 tumors well in vivo , are not shown. (I) Semiquantitative ex vivo biodistribution in tumors and organs post-sacrifice, with values expressed as means ± SD ( n = 3); where ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ns non-significant.

    Journal: Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B

    Article Title: Evolution-guided design of mini-protein for high-contrast in vivo imaging

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.07.015

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Experimental characterization of designed HER2-binding (BindHer) proteins. (A) Real-time binding profile of computationally designed proteins with the HER2 ECD through surface plasmon resonance (SPR), where designed proteins were injected as analytes in a 2-fold dilution series ranging from 100 to 3.125 nmol/L. K D is the equilibrium dissociation constant. (B) Denaturation curves obtained using differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF), where designed proteins were subjected to thermal scans from 25 to 95 °C at a heating rate of 1 °C/min with signals recorded at wavelengths of 350/330 nm. Melting temperature ( T m ) is marked by vertical lines. (C) Circular dichroism (CD) spectra of designed proteins under controlled temperature and timing conditions. (D) Flow cytometry assessing HER2 binding to MDA-MB-231, BT-474, and SK-BR-3 cells using FITC-conjugated designed proteins. (E) Quantification of the signal transformation in terms of molar residue ellipticity (MRE) at a wavelength of 222 nm for the designed proteins in CD spectra. (F) Quantification of fluorescence intensity performed in D. (G) Evaluation of trypsin resistance, where designed proteins are incubated with trypsin concentrations in 0.01–10 μmol/L, followed by the analyses using SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis (top) and gray intensity analysis comparison (bottom). (H) In vivo living imaging from 1 to 8 h after FITC-labelled designed proteins administration via tail vein in HER2-overexpressing xenograft tumor-bearing mice; where other two designs (Design.01 and Design.03) which failed to target HER2 tumors well in vivo , are not shown. (I) Semiquantitative ex vivo biodistribution in tumors and organs post-sacrifice, with values expressed as means ± SD ( n = 3); where ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ns non-significant.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant Human HER2 ECD (1004-HCCH, Sino Biological) was immobilized (∼2000 resonance units) on a CM5 sensor chip (BR-1000-12, GE Life Sciences) and analyzed using a Biacore instrument (Biacore X100, GE Life Sciences).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, SPR Assay, Injection, Circular Dichroism, Flow Cytometry, Transformation Assay, Residue, Fluorescence, Incubation, SDS Page, Nucleic Acid Electrophoresis, Comparison, In Vivo, Imaging, Ex Vivo

    In vitro pharmacodynamic characterization of BindHer. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of HER2 levels in SK-BR-3 cells treated with HER2 siRNA, using Trastuzumab-PE/Cy7 to confirm HER2 expression. (B) ELISA confirming BindHer's binding specificity to HER2 across concentrations from 100 to 0.098 nmol/L. (C) In vivo immunogenicity of BindHer and ABY-025 with hIgG used as a positive control. (D) Western blot of SK-BR-3 cell lysates following BindHer treatment at various concentrations, with EGF as a positive control. Equal protein amounts were loaded in each lane; SDS-PAGE gels were run, and membranes were sectioned by molecular weight for analysis of total HER2, phospho-HER2, and β -actin. Phospho-HER2/HER2 quantification is depicted in graphs, where ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001; ns denotes non-significant results.

    Journal: Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B

    Article Title: Evolution-guided design of mini-protein for high-contrast in vivo imaging

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.07.015

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In vitro pharmacodynamic characterization of BindHer. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of HER2 levels in SK-BR-3 cells treated with HER2 siRNA, using Trastuzumab-PE/Cy7 to confirm HER2 expression. (B) ELISA confirming BindHer's binding specificity to HER2 across concentrations from 100 to 0.098 nmol/L. (C) In vivo immunogenicity of BindHer and ABY-025 with hIgG used as a positive control. (D) Western blot of SK-BR-3 cell lysates following BindHer treatment at various concentrations, with EGF as a positive control. Equal protein amounts were loaded in each lane; SDS-PAGE gels were run, and membranes were sectioned by molecular weight for analysis of total HER2, phospho-HER2, and β -actin. Phospho-HER2/HER2 quantification is depicted in graphs, where ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001; ns denotes non-significant results.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant Human HER2 ECD (1004-HCCH, Sino Biological) was immobilized (∼2000 resonance units) on a CM5 sensor chip (BR-1000-12, GE Life Sciences) and analyzed using a Biacore instrument (Biacore X100, GE Life Sciences).

    Techniques: In Vitro, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Binding Assay, In Vivo, Immunopeptidomics, Positive Control, Western Blot, SDS Page, Molecular Weight

    99m TC-BindHer noninvasive SPECT imaging of HER2 expression and biodistribution in mice with breast cancer xenografts. (A) Schematic of 99m Tc-labelled BindHer structure, with a GGGC chelator at the C-terminus for 99m Tc complexation. (B) Radiochemical stability of 99m Tc-BindHer (red curve) and 99m Tc-ABY-025 (blue curve) is assessed in vitro in PBS (dot) and serum (square) at 37 °C. (C) SPECT/CT imaging of 99m TC-BindHer in tumour-bearing mice at 1, 2, and 4 h, the arrows indicate the location of the tumor. (D) Data for tumor uptake at different time points. (E) Data for tissue uptake at 2 h point. (F) SPECT images of HER2 tumor-bearing mice after tail vein injection of 99m TC-BindHer (top) or 99m Tc-ABY-025 (bottom) at 1, 2, and 4 h. Coronal imaging was performed to visualize the mice (top), while transverse imaging captured the tumor and liver regions (bottom). The arrows indicate significant radionuclide accumulation in various tissues, including liver (L), kidney (K), and tumor (T). (G) Quantification of SPECT signals in HER2 tumors (top) and liver (bottom). Values are expressed as the means ± SD ( n = 3). where ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001, ns represents non-significant.

    Journal: Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B

    Article Title: Evolution-guided design of mini-protein for high-contrast in vivo imaging

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.07.015

    Figure Lengend Snippet: 99m TC-BindHer noninvasive SPECT imaging of HER2 expression and biodistribution in mice with breast cancer xenografts. (A) Schematic of 99m Tc-labelled BindHer structure, with a GGGC chelator at the C-terminus for 99m Tc complexation. (B) Radiochemical stability of 99m Tc-BindHer (red curve) and 99m Tc-ABY-025 (blue curve) is assessed in vitro in PBS (dot) and serum (square) at 37 °C. (C) SPECT/CT imaging of 99m TC-BindHer in tumour-bearing mice at 1, 2, and 4 h, the arrows indicate the location of the tumor. (D) Data for tumor uptake at different time points. (E) Data for tissue uptake at 2 h point. (F) SPECT images of HER2 tumor-bearing mice after tail vein injection of 99m TC-BindHer (top) or 99m Tc-ABY-025 (bottom) at 1, 2, and 4 h. Coronal imaging was performed to visualize the mice (top), while transverse imaging captured the tumor and liver regions (bottom). The arrows indicate significant radionuclide accumulation in various tissues, including liver (L), kidney (K), and tumor (T). (G) Quantification of SPECT signals in HER2 tumors (top) and liver (bottom). Values are expressed as the means ± SD ( n = 3). where ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001, ns represents non-significant.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant Human HER2 ECD (1004-HCCH, Sino Biological) was immobilized (∼2000 resonance units) on a CM5 sensor chip (BR-1000-12, GE Life Sciences) and analyzed using a Biacore instrument (Biacore X100, GE Life Sciences).

    Techniques: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Imaging, Expressing, In Vitro, Injection

    68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer noninvasive PET imaging of HER2 expression and biodistribution in mice with breast cancer xenografts. (A) Synthesis flow chart of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer. The precursor protein was first formed through a Michael addition reaction at 25 °C overnight using BindHer and MAL-NOTA, followed by chelation of 68 Ga and precursors in sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.0) at 75 °C for 15 min which resulted in the production of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer. (B) SDA-PAGE analysis of ABY-025 and BindHer reaction products with MAL-NOTA at varying chelation ratios. (C) HPLC analysis of reaction products at various chelation ratios. (D, E) Stability of NOTA-ABY-025 and NOTA-BindHer at 85 °C for 60 min or 25 °C for 4 weeks, with SDA-PAGE on the left and gray-value analysis on the right. (F) PET/CT imaging of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer and 68 Ga-NOTA-ABY-025 at different time points in HER2-expression tumor bearing mice. L: liver, K: kidneys, and T: tumor. (G) Quantification of PET signal in tumor (left) and liver (right), respectively. (H) The PET/CT imaging of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer at different time points in tumor bearing mice. (I) Comparison of tumor absorptions of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer at different time points. (J) Comparison of tissues absorption of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer at 90 min. Values are means ± SD ( n = 3), where ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001, ns represents non-significant.

    Journal: Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B

    Article Title: Evolution-guided design of mini-protein for high-contrast in vivo imaging

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.07.015

    Figure Lengend Snippet: 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer noninvasive PET imaging of HER2 expression and biodistribution in mice with breast cancer xenografts. (A) Synthesis flow chart of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer. The precursor protein was first formed through a Michael addition reaction at 25 °C overnight using BindHer and MAL-NOTA, followed by chelation of 68 Ga and precursors in sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.0) at 75 °C for 15 min which resulted in the production of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer. (B) SDA-PAGE analysis of ABY-025 and BindHer reaction products with MAL-NOTA at varying chelation ratios. (C) HPLC analysis of reaction products at various chelation ratios. (D, E) Stability of NOTA-ABY-025 and NOTA-BindHer at 85 °C for 60 min or 25 °C for 4 weeks, with SDA-PAGE on the left and gray-value analysis on the right. (F) PET/CT imaging of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer and 68 Ga-NOTA-ABY-025 at different time points in HER2-expression tumor bearing mice. L: liver, K: kidneys, and T: tumor. (G) Quantification of PET signal in tumor (left) and liver (right), respectively. (H) The PET/CT imaging of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer at different time points in tumor bearing mice. (I) Comparison of tumor absorptions of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer at different time points. (J) Comparison of tissues absorption of 68 Ga-NOTA-BindHer at 90 min. Values are means ± SD ( n = 3), where ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001, ns represents non-significant.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant Human HER2 ECD (1004-HCCH, Sino Biological) was immobilized (∼2000 resonance units) on a CM5 sensor chip (BR-1000-12, GE Life Sciences) and analyzed using a Biacore instrument (Biacore X100, GE Life Sciences).

    Techniques: Imaging, Expressing, Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, Comparison

    18 F-NOTA-BindHer noninvasive PET imaging of HER2 expression and biodistribution in breast cancer xenograft mice. (A) Synthesis of 18 F-NOTA-BindHer through Al18F chelation in sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.0) at 100 °C for 15 min, followed by impurity removal via gel filtration chromatography. (B) Coronal and transverse Micro-PET/CT imaging of breast cancer xenograft mice treated with 18 F-NOTA-BindHer and 18 F-NOTA-ABY-025, showing the presence of HER2 positive breast cancer tumors (T), liver (L) and kidneys (K) at various time points. (C) Quantitative time–radioactivity curves of 18 F-NOTA-BindHer (blue circle) and 18 F-NOTA-ABY-025 (red tirangle) in tumors and liver, based on dynamic PET/CT imaging over 0–1 h. (D) Static Micro-PET/CT scanning of both HER2 + SK-BR-3 (blow, blue circle) (Imaging is shared with the image in B), HER2 + SK-BR-3+Blocking (orange square) and (MDA-MB-3) (blue circle) tumor-bearing nude mice models at 10, 30, and 60 min. Arrows indicate tumor locations. (E) Tumor absorption of 18 F-NOTA-BindHer at different time points. (F) Tissue absorption of 18 F-NOTA-BindHer at 60 min. Values are means ± SD ( n = 3), where ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001, ns represents non-significant.

    Journal: Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B

    Article Title: Evolution-guided design of mini-protein for high-contrast in vivo imaging

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.07.015

    Figure Lengend Snippet: 18 F-NOTA-BindHer noninvasive PET imaging of HER2 expression and biodistribution in breast cancer xenograft mice. (A) Synthesis of 18 F-NOTA-BindHer through Al18F chelation in sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.0) at 100 °C for 15 min, followed by impurity removal via gel filtration chromatography. (B) Coronal and transverse Micro-PET/CT imaging of breast cancer xenograft mice treated with 18 F-NOTA-BindHer and 18 F-NOTA-ABY-025, showing the presence of HER2 positive breast cancer tumors (T), liver (L) and kidneys (K) at various time points. (C) Quantitative time–radioactivity curves of 18 F-NOTA-BindHer (blue circle) and 18 F-NOTA-ABY-025 (red tirangle) in tumors and liver, based on dynamic PET/CT imaging over 0–1 h. (D) Static Micro-PET/CT scanning of both HER2 + SK-BR-3 (blow, blue circle) (Imaging is shared with the image in B), HER2 + SK-BR-3+Blocking (orange square) and (MDA-MB-3) (blue circle) tumor-bearing nude mice models at 10, 30, and 60 min. Arrows indicate tumor locations. (E) Tumor absorption of 18 F-NOTA-BindHer at different time points. (F) Tissue absorption of 18 F-NOTA-BindHer at 60 min. Values are means ± SD ( n = 3), where ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001, ns represents non-significant.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant Human HER2 ECD (1004-HCCH, Sino Biological) was immobilized (∼2000 resonance units) on a CM5 sensor chip (BR-1000-12, GE Life Sciences) and analyzed using a Biacore instrument (Biacore X100, GE Life Sciences).

    Techniques: Imaging, Expressing, Filtration, Chromatography, Micro-PET, Radioactivity, Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, Blocking Assay

    Characteristics of designed BindHer protein. (A) Sequence alignments of BindHer (Design.05) with ZHER2:342, ABY-025, and wild-type Z-domain. Conserved residues are indicated by “:”, yellow highlights mutated residues against Z-domain, and blue stars mark the core interface binding residues (R10, Y13, W14, R28, R32, Y35) with HER2. (B) Structural alignment of the I-TASSER (green) and AlphaFold2 (orange) prediction of BindHer. (C) Structure overlay of AlphaFold2 model of BindHer on ABY-025 in complex with HER2. The right panel shows the zoom-in of the ABY-025 structure, where the core interface residues to HER2 ECD are displayed in sticks. For reference, the Fab fragments of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab (red) and pertuzumab (cyan) are shown binding HER2 epitopes, which are distant from the binding regions of BindHer and ABY-025.Right showed that the core interface binding residues (R10, Y13, W14, R28, R32, Y35) with HER2. (D) Distribution of surface hydrophobic networks, with orange indicating hydrophobic residues of ABY-025 and BindHer. (E) Bis-ANS fluorescence of ABY-025 and BindHer at different concentration, with error bar representing 95% confidence interval (CI) from three technical replicates, ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F) The ABY-025 and BindHer structures are depicted in the electrostatic surface view, with red representing potentials of –5 KTe –1 and blue representing potentials of 5 kTe -1 . The electrostatic potentials were computed using PyMol's APBS module. (G) Comparison of positive, negative and net charges of ABY-025 and BindHer. The secondary structure, surface hydrophobicity, and surface electrostatic potentials of each protein in the plot were visualized using PyMol and UCSF ChimeraX.

    Journal: Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B

    Article Title: Evolution-guided design of mini-protein for high-contrast in vivo imaging

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.07.015

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Characteristics of designed BindHer protein. (A) Sequence alignments of BindHer (Design.05) with ZHER2:342, ABY-025, and wild-type Z-domain. Conserved residues are indicated by “:”, yellow highlights mutated residues against Z-domain, and blue stars mark the core interface binding residues (R10, Y13, W14, R28, R32, Y35) with HER2. (B) Structural alignment of the I-TASSER (green) and AlphaFold2 (orange) prediction of BindHer. (C) Structure overlay of AlphaFold2 model of BindHer on ABY-025 in complex with HER2. The right panel shows the zoom-in of the ABY-025 structure, where the core interface residues to HER2 ECD are displayed in sticks. For reference, the Fab fragments of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab (red) and pertuzumab (cyan) are shown binding HER2 epitopes, which are distant from the binding regions of BindHer and ABY-025.Right showed that the core interface binding residues (R10, Y13, W14, R28, R32, Y35) with HER2. (D) Distribution of surface hydrophobic networks, with orange indicating hydrophobic residues of ABY-025 and BindHer. (E) Bis-ANS fluorescence of ABY-025 and BindHer at different concentration, with error bar representing 95% confidence interval (CI) from three technical replicates, ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F) The ABY-025 and BindHer structures are depicted in the electrostatic surface view, with red representing potentials of –5 KTe –1 and blue representing potentials of 5 kTe -1 . The electrostatic potentials were computed using PyMol's APBS module. (G) Comparison of positive, negative and net charges of ABY-025 and BindHer. The secondary structure, surface hydrophobicity, and surface electrostatic potentials of each protein in the plot were visualized using PyMol and UCSF ChimeraX.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant Human HER2 ECD (1004-HCCH, Sino Biological) was immobilized (∼2000 resonance units) on a CM5 sensor chip (BR-1000-12, GE Life Sciences) and analyzed using a Biacore instrument (Biacore X100, GE Life Sciences).

    Techniques: Sequencing, Binding Assay, Bioprocessing, Fluorescence, Concentration Assay, Comparison